Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services
Preventive home visits to older people
Preventative home visits are aimed at maintaining the independence and health of older people living in their own homes without home care. The content of the home visits can vary between different organisations and countries.
Share:
Reading time approx. 11 minutes
Published:
Publication type:
Question
What systematic reviews are published on preventive home visits for older people?
Identified literature
| NHS = National health services in the United kingdoms; PHV = Preventive home visits; QOL = Quality-of-life. | ||
| Included studies | Population/Intervention | Outcome |
| Liimatta et al (2016) [1] | ||
| Study design: Included only randomized control studies (RCT). Selection of studies: Search resulted in 3219 abstracts and synthesis included 19 papers. |
Population: Community-dwelling older people (Aged 65+) with multiple health problems. Studies targeting people with one specific disease or diagnosis were excluded. Intervention: Preventive home visiting programs. Studies evaluating follow-up home visits related to a recent hospital discharge where excluded. |
Primary outcomes: Use- and/or costs of health care and social services. Secondary outcomes: Functioning, Quality-of-life (QOL), and Mortality. |
| Authors' conclusion: “Only a few studies explored economic effects. PHVs do not provide overall savings to health care costs, but come interventions might offer some cost-neutral positive effects on functioning, QOL and/or mortality. More studies are needed to clarify the effective aspects of the programs and cost-effectiveness of the PHVs” |
||
| Tourigny et al (2015) [2] | ||
| Study design: Included systematic reviews (SR) or SR of systematic reviews of controlled primary studies. Selection of studies: Search resulted in 5973 abstracts and the synthesis included 10 reviews. |
Population: Older people (Aged 65+) needing home care and identified as frail. Intervention: Preventive home visits approaches or models. Coordinating programs between providers were included as long they were carried out in participants home. |
Primary outcomes: All impacts on patients (including but not limited to mortality and function), caregivers (health and wellbeing) and on professionals; as well as on use of services and organization of care. |
| Authors' conclusion: “The evidence gathered in this systematic review of systematic reviews is relatively scarce and often inconclusive. In that sense, we generally agree with other authors that multidimensional preventive home visiting programs present conflicting results on most outcomes. We nevertheless found that this type of program might reduce mortality, in particular for the participants in the youngest tertile” |
||
| Grant et al (2014) [3] | ||
| Study design: Included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clustered RCTs. Selection of studies: Search resulted in 18784 abstracts and the synthesis included 89 papers. |
Population: Older people (Aged 65+) who were living at home (alone or with a partner). Studies which more than 50% of participants had dementia were excluded. Intervention: Visits at home by a health or social care professional. Studies evaluating follow-up home visits directly related to a recent hospital discharge were excluded. |
Primary outcomes: Mortality Secondary outcomes: Institutionalisation, Hospitalisation, Falls, Injuries, Physical functioning, Cognitive functioning, Quality of life, Psychiatric illness. |
| Authors' conclusion: “We were unable to identify reliable effects of home visits overall or in any subset of studies In this review. It is possible that some home visiting programmes have beneficial effects for community-dwelling older adults, but poor reporting of how interventions and comparisons were implemented prevents more robust conclusions.” |
||
| Tappenden et al (2012) [4] | ||
| Study design: Clinical effectiveness: Included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Non-randomized studies were excluded. Cost-effectiveness: Included full comparative economic evaluations that presents both costs and health outcomes. Selection of studies: Clinical effectiveness: Search resulted in 2068 abstracts and the synthesis included 11 papers. Cost-effectiveness: Search resulted in 1988 abstracts and the synthesis included 3 papers. |
Population: Older people (Aged 75+) at risk of admission to hospital, residential or nursing care. Intervention: Structured home-based, nurse-led health promotion undertaken in the UK. |
Primary outcomes: Admission to hospital, residential or nursing care, mortality, morbidity including depression, falls, accidents, deteriorating health status, patient satisfaction, costs. |
| Authors' conclusion: “Home-based, nurse-led health promotion may offer clinical benefits across a number of important health dimensions. However, it is generally unclear from the available studies which components of this type of complex intervention contribute towards individual aspects of benefit for older people. Given the limitations of the current evidence base, it remains unclear whether or not home-based health promotion interventions offer good value for money for the NHS and associated sectors.” |
||
References
- Liimatta H, Lampela P, Laitinen-Parkkonen P, Pitkala KH. Effects of preventive home visits on older people's use and costs of health care services: A systematic review. Eur Geriatr Med 2016;7:571-80.
- Tourigny A, Bédard A, Laurin D, Kröger E, Dur P, et al. Preventive Home Visits for Older People: A Systematic Review. Can J Aging 2015;34:506-23.
- Grant S, Parsons A, Burton J, Montgomery P, Underhill K, Wilson EM. Home Visits for Prevention of Impairment and Death in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2014;10:1-85.
- Tappenden P, Campbell F, Rawdin A, Wong R, Kalita N. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based, nurse-led health promotion for older people: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2012;16:1-72.
Literature search
| The search result, usually found at the end of the documentation, forms the list of abstracts.; [MeSH] = Term from the Medline controlled vocabulary, including terms found below this term in the MeSH hierarchy; [MeSH:NoExp] = Does not include terms found below this term in the MeSH hierarchy; [MAJR] = MeSH Major Topic; [TIAB] = Title or abstract; [TI] = Title; [AU] = Author; [TW] = Text Word; Systematic[SB] = Filter for retrieving systematic reviews; * = Truncation | ||
| Search terms | Items found | |
| Intervention: | ||
| 1. | House Calls/ | 3485 |
| 2. | ((Home OR preventive OR domiciliary) ADJ2 visit*).ti,ab. | 10250 |
| 3. | (Home OR Prevent*).ti,ab AND "Health promotion".tw | 10051 |
| 4. | 1 OR 2 OR 3 | 21827 |
| Population: | ||
| 5. | exp Aged/ | 3041480 |
| 6. | ((elderly or aged or old$) adj2 (person$ or people$ or m?n or wom?n or patient$)).ti,ab. | 714320 |
| 7. | (geriatric$ or senior citizen$).ti,ab | 46885 |
| 8. | 5 OR 6 OR 7 | 3469976 |
| Study types: | ||
| 9. | Exp systematic review/ OR cochrane library.mp OR exp meta analysis/ | 191889 |
| 10. | ((systematic* ADJ3 review) OR meta analy* OR metaanaly*).ab,ti,kw | 255856 |
| 11. | 9 OR 10 | 282791 |
| Combined sets: | ||
| 12. | 4 AND 8 | 5311 |
| Final | 11 AND 12 | 102 |
| The search result, usually found at the end of the documentation, forms the list of abstracts.; au = Author; MeSH = Term from the Medline controlled vocabulary, including terms found below this term in the MeSH hierarchy; this term only = Does not include terms found below this term in the MeSH hierarchy; :ti = Title; :ab = Abstract; :kw = Keyword; * = Truncation; “ “ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase; CDSR = Cochrane Database of Systematic Review; CENTRAL = Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, “trials”; CRM = Method Studies; DARE = Database Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, “other reviews”; EED = Economic Evaluations; HTA = Health Technology Assessments | ||
| Search terms | Items found | |
| Intervention: | ||
| 1. | [mh ^"House Calls"] | 499 |
| 2. | ((Home OR preventive OR domiciliary) NEAR/2 visit*):ti,ab | 3626 |
| 3. | (Home OR Prevent*):ti,ab AND "Health promotion":ti,ab | 1075 |
| 4. | 1 OR 2 OR 3 | 4728 |
| Population: | ||
| 5. | [mh Aged] | 1296 |
| 6. | ((elderly OR aged OR old*) NEAR/2 (person* OR people* OR m?n OR wom?n OR patient*)):ti,ab | 66372 |
| 7. | (geriatric* OR "senior citizen*"):ti,ab | 5678 |
| 8. | 5 OR 6 OR 7 | 70401 |
| Study types: | ||
| 9. | Cochrane Reviews | |
| Combined sets: | ||
| 10. | 4 AND 8 | 636 |
| Final | 9 AND 10 | 7 |
| /de = Term from the EMTREE controlled vocabulary; /exp = Includes terms found below this term in the EMTREE hierarchy; /mj = Major Topic; :ab = Abstract; :au = Author; :ti = Article Title; :ti,ab = Title or abstract; * = Truncation; ’ ’ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase | ||
| Search terms | Items found | |
| Intervention: | ||
| 1. | 'home visit' OR 'visiting nursing service' | 5309 |
| 2. | ((Home OR preventive OR domiciliary) NEAR/2 visit*):ti,ab | 13470 |
| 3. | (Home OR Prevent*):ti,ab AND ‘Health promotion’:ti,ab | 12116 |
| 4. | 1 OR 2 OR 3 | 26170 |
| Population: | ||
| 5. | 'aged'/exp | 3019056 |
| 6. | ((elderly OR aged OR old*) NEAR/2 (person* OR people* OR m?n OR wom?n OR patient*)):ti,ab | 991632 |
| 7. | (geriatric* OR ‘senior citizen*’):ti,ab | 75815 |
| 8. | 5 OR 6 OR 7 | 3643890 |
| Study types: | ||
| 9. | 'systematic review'/exp OR ‘cochrane library’/exp OR 'meta analysis'/exp | 327162 |
| 10. | ((systematic* NEAR/3 review) OR ‘meta analy*’ OR metaanaly*):ti,ab | 325756 |
| 11. | 9 OR 10 | 417088 |
| Combined sets: | ||
| 12. | 4 AND 8 | 5766 |
| Final | 11 AND 12 | 111 |
| The search result, usually found at the end of the documentation, forms the list of abstracts.; AB = Abstract; AU = Author; DE = Term from the thesaurus; MM = Major Concept; TI = Title; TX = All Text. Performs a keyword search of all the database's searchable fields; ZC = Methodology Index; * = Truncation; “ “ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase | ||
| Search terms | Items found | |
| Intervention: | ||
| 1. | (DE "OUTREACH programs" OR (DE "HOME care services") | 2836 |
| 2. | (TI (Home OR preventive OR domiciliary) N2 visit*) OR (AB (Home OR preventive OR domiciliary) N2 visit*) | 1900 |
| 3. | (TI (Home OR Prevent*)) AND (TI "Health promotion" OR AB "Health promotion") OR (AB (Home OR Prevent*)) AND (TI "Health promotion" OR AB "Health promotion") | 1236 |
| 4. | 1 OR 2 OR 3 | 5690 |
| Population: | ||
| 5. | DE "OLDER people" | 7927 |
| 6. | (TI (elderly OR aged OR old*) N2 (person* OR people* OR m#n OR wom#n OR patient*)) OR (AB (elderly OR aged OR old*) N2 (person* OR people* OR m#n OR wom#n OR patient*)) | 29086 |
| 7. | (TI (geriatric* OR "senior citizen*")) OR (AB (geriatric* OR "senior citizen*")) | 4799 |
| 8. | 5 OR 6 OR 7 | 36564 |
| Study types: | ||
| 9. | DE "Systematic reviews (Medical research)" OR DE "Cochrane reviews" OR DE "Meta-analysis" | 5181 |
| 10. | (TI (systematic* N3 review) OR "meta analy*" OR metaanaly*) OR (AB (systematic* N3 review) OR "meta analy*" OR metaanaly*) | 7999 |
| 11. | 9 OR 10 | 8916 |
| Combined sets: | ||
| 12. | 4 AND 8 | 694 |
| Final | 11 AND 12 | 15 |
| The search result, usually found at the end of the documentation, forms the list of abstracts.; AB = Abstract; AU = Author; DE = Term from the thesaurus; MM = Major Concept; TI = Title; TX = All Text. Performs a keyword search of all the database's searchable fields; ZC = Methodology Index; * = Truncation; “ “ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase | ||
| Search terms | Items found | |
| Intervention: | ||
| 1. | (MH "Home Visits") | 5639 |
| 2. | (TI (Home OR preventive OR domiciliary) N2 visit*) OR (AB (Home OR preventive OR domiciliary) N2 visit*) | 6833 |
| 3. | (TI (Home OR Prevent*)) AND (TI "Health promotion" OR AB "Health promotion") OR (AB (Home OR Prevent*)) AND (TI "Health promotion" OR AB "Health promotion") | 5810 |
| 4. | 1 OR 2 OR 3 | 15704 |
| Population: | ||
| 5. | (MH "Aged+") | 753668 |
| 6. | (TI (elderly OR aged OR old*) N2 (person* OR people* OR m#n OR wom#n OR patient*)) OR (AB (elderly OR aged OR old*) N2 (person* OR people* OR m#n OR wom#n OR patient*)) | 153389 |
| 7. | (TI (geriatric* OR "senior citizen*")) OR (AB (geriatric* OR "senior citizen*")) | 22240 |
| 8. | 5 OR 6 OR 7 | 822427 |
| Study types: | ||
| 9. | (MH "Systematic Review") OR (MH "Cochrane Library") OR (MH "Meta Analysis") | 102233 |
| 10. | (TI (systematic* N3 review) OR "meta analy*" OR metaanaly*) OR (AB (systematic* N3 review) OR "meta analy*" OR metaanaly*) | 126805 |
| 11. | 9 OR 10 | 155274 |
| Combined sets: | ||
| 12. | 4 AND 8 | 3705 |
| Final | 11 AND 12 | 112 |
| The search result, usually found at the end of the documentation, forms the list of abstracts | ||
| Search terms | Items found | |
| Intervention: | ||
| 1. | Home visit | 14 |
| Final | 1 | 14 |
Page published