Uppföljningsintervall med datortomografi för patienter som genomgått behandling för lungcancer
This page contains 1 evidence gap
What evidence is needed?
More primary research is needed.
What evidence is available?
Reliable systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:
None identified
Reliable, but not updated, systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:
None identified
Litteratursammanställning från HTA Syd: HTA syd. Intervall för radiologisk uppföljning efter lungcancer. Litteratursammanställning. Lund: Region Skåne; 2023.
Läs rapporten
- Registration number:
- Published:
Research conducted after publication could potentially change the nature of the evidence.
To top
Evidence gap identifies methods or practices for which no conclusive systematic review of benefits and harms has been published. Gaps in scientific evidence appear on the SBU website to help researchers and granting agencies identify areas that are in need of research or systematic review. An additional objective is to offer healthcare and social service providers a basis for setting priorities.