Social and psychological treatment in compulsory treatment of girls

What evidence is needed?

A systematic review is needed.

What evidence is available?

Reliable systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

None identified

Reliable, but not updated, systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

None identified

Information from: SBU. Förstudie: Behandlingsinsatser för flickor i tvångsvård. Stockholm: Statens beredning för medicinsk och social utvärdering (SBU); 2021. Published 2021-10-29. Information in Swedish

Registration number:
Published:
Research conducted after publication could potentially change the nature of the evidence.

Evidence gap identifies methods or practices for which no conclusive systematic review of benefits and harms has been published. Gaps in scientific evidence appear on the SBU website to help researchers and granting agencies identify areas that are in need of research or systematic review. An additional objective is to offer healthcare and social service providers a basis for setting priorities.