Long term effects of robot-assisted vs freehand surgery of the spine

What evidence is needed?

More primary research is needed.

What evidence is available?

Reliable systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

En systematisk översikt om robotassisterad vs sedvanlig ryggkirurgi. Örebro: Centre for Assessment of Medical Technology in Örebro (Camtö); 2023. HTA-rapport 2023:57 More about the review

Reliable, but not updated, systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

None identified

Registration number:
Research conducted after publication could potentially change the nature of the evidence.

Evidence gap identifies methods or practices for which no conclusive systematic review of benefits and harms has been published. Gaps in scientific evidence appear on the SBU website to help researchers and granting agencies identify areas that are in need of research or systematic review. An additional objective is to offer healthcare and social service providers a basis for setting priorities.