This publication was published more than 5 years ago. The state of knowledge may have changed.

Scheduled replacement of peripheral venous catheters has no advantage over replacement on clinical indications

Reading time less than 1 minute Published: Publication type:

SBU Prioritisation support

provides evidence-based support for prioritising of health and social services, while calling special attention to practices that are harmful or ineffective.

Summary

Replacing peripheral venous catheters at scheduled intervals has shown no advantage over replacement when clin­ic­ally indicated. Replacement on clinical indications means not only fewer interventions and hence less discomfort for the patient, but also a cost saving.

peripheral venous catheter

Published:
Page published