- Interventions to children in foster care and their foster parents can improve the children’s psychological and physical health, social situation, quality of life, and also the stability of placements. Due to the differences between the interventions and variation in the scientific design of the studies, it is not possible to determine which interventions or parts of these activities are better than others.
- There is evidence that three specific interventions are effective:
– Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up targeting foster parents can improve children’s attachment behaviors
– Incredible Years can improve parenting abilities of foster parents, as well as decrease children’s externalizing behaviors
– Take Charge for young people can improve children’s self-determination skills, high school completion and increase their likelihood of future employment.
- For the other 15 interventions that were identified in the systematic review, there was not sufficient studies to assess their effects, when applying the GRADE-model of assessing evidence from evaluations. The absence of robust evidence for these interventions does not necessarily imply that they are ineffective, rather that the empirical evidence is not up to GRADE-standards.
- None of the interventions currently used in Sweden have been evaluated in controlled trials. In Swedish foster care service, emphasis is on investigating foster parent’s suitability and preservice training. Providing structured interventions for children and foster parents in a systematic way when the child is in foster care is far less common. People who have grown up in foster care, their birth and foster parents – all express desires for interventions that support both children and foster parents during placement.
- Far more research is needed to assess the impact of foster care interventions. All 18 interventions that the systematic review identified can presumably be successfully implemented in the Swedish context, but their effects should be evaluated in Sweden. The interventions already in use in Sweden need to be evaluated. Studies that highlight cost-effectiveness of interventions for foster children are generally few and far in-between, and totally absent in a Swedish context.
- Martin Bergström, Ph.D. Associate Professor, School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Sciences, Lund University
- Marianne Cederblad, Professor Emerita, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Lund University
- Christian Munthe, Professor, Practical Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Linguistics, Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg
- Bo Vinnerljung, Professor Emeritus of Social Work, University of Stockholm; Senior Researcher, Clinical Epidemiology/Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
- Ingegerd Wirtberg, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, Cert Psychotherapist, Department of Psychology, Lund University
- Knut Sundell, Project Manager
- Kickan Håkanson, Project Administrator
- Pia Johansson, Health Economist
- Ann Kristine Jonsson, Information Specialist
- Pernilla Östlund, Assistant Project Manager
Article from SBU's newsletter Medical and Social Science & Practice
Child welfare: Supportive interventions may provide assistance at foster homes
Children placed at foster homes may benefit from supportive interventions – they fare better and face a lower risk of changes or discontinuation of the arrangement. Few Swedish children or foster parents are offered that kind of support. The SBU review also found a lack of research concerning various methods to train and assess the suitability of foster families.Read the article
More on the subject
Bergström M, Cederblad M, Håkansson K, Jonsson AK, Munthe C, Vinnerljung B, et al. Interventions in Foster Family Care: A Systematic Review. Research on Social Work Practice. 2020;30(1):3-18. Open Access.