This publication was published more than 5 years ago. The state of knowledge may have changed.

Cardiac pumps in treating chronic heart failure

Reading time approx. 6 minutes Published: Updated: Publication type:

SBU Assessment

Presents a comprehensive, systematic assessment of available scientific evidence for effects on health, social welfare or disability. Full assessments include economic, social and ethical impact analyses. Assessment teams include professional practitioners and academics. Before publication the report is reviewed by external experts, and scientific conclusions approved by the SBU Board of Directors.

Findings by SBU Alert

Version: 4

Technology and target group

Chronic heart failure can be treated mechanically with cardiac pumps (left ventricular assist device, LVAD). Different types of pump systems are available. To date, cardiac pumps have been used temporarily as a bridge-to-transplant in patients with heart failure. These patients have advanced disease, and pharmacological treatment has been insufficient. The need for organs in heart transplantation is greater than their availability. The development of new types of pumps that are substantially smaller may enable permanent treatment. These axial-flow left ventricular assist devices have recently been tested within the framework of scientific assessments. The target group for permanent treatment include patients with advanced heart failure who are either not suitable for transplantation or for whom organs are not available. An estimated 1 percent to 2 percent of all patients with severe heart failure and who are not candidates for transplantation, ie, 2000 to 4000 patients, comprise a potential target group for permanent treatment with this new type of cardiac pump.

Patient benefit

To date, somewhat over 3500 patients worldwide have received temporary mechanical support from implanted cardiac pumps (mainly displacement pumps). Several uncontrolled studies of patient series have reported that between 60 percent and 80 percent of patients survived until transplantation. Many of these patients could spend periods of time at home, and in some cases return to work. There is one randomized controlled trial comparing the long-term use of displacement pumps with pharmacological treatment for 129 patients with end stage heart failure who were ineligible for cardiac transplantation. The median survival was 408 days in the cardiac pump group compared to 150 days in the pharmacological group. Mechanical failures, all of which occurred after the initial 12 months, were responsible for 7 of 41 deaths in the cardiac pump group.

Scientific evidence

There is moderate* scientific documentation concerning the effects of using displacement pumps. The greatest interest is associated with the new axial-flow pumps which have recently been tested for both temporary and permanent treatment. Currently, there is no* scientific documentation on neither the patient benefits nor the costs associated with this type of cardiac pumps.

If the planned assessments show that the new axial-flow pumps have positive effects on patient survival and quality of life at a reasonable cost in relation to current methods, this new type of cardiac pumps may have a major impact on health care.

*This assessment by SBU Alert uses a 4-point scale to grade the quality and evidence of the scientific documentation. The grades indicate: (1) good, (2) moderate, (3) poor, or (4) no scientific evidence on the subject.

This summary is based on a report prepared at SBU in collaboration with Urban Lönn, MD PhD, Uppsala University Hospital and Henrik Casimir-Ahn, MD PhD, The University Hospital of Linköping. It has been reviewed by Assoc Prof Torkel Åberg, Norrland University Hospital, Umeå and Assoc Prof Ulf Dahlström, The University Hospital of Linköping.

The complete report is available only in Swedish.

Alert is a joint effort by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU), the Medical Products Agency, the National Board of Health and Welfare, and the Federation of Swedish County Councils.

References

  1. Bank AJ, Mir SH, Nguyen DQ, Bolman RM 3rd, Shumway SJ et al. Effects of left ventricular assist devices on outcomes in patients undergoing heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69(5):1369-74.
  2. Deng MC, Weynard M, Hammel D et al. Selection and outcome of ventricular assist device patients: The Muenster experience. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998;17(8):817-25.
  3. Deng MC, Loebe M, El-Banayosy A, Gronda E, Jansen PG et al. Mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure: Effect of patient selection and outcome. Circulation 2001;103(2):231-7.
  4. El-Banayosy A, Arusoglu L, Kizner L, Tenderich G, Minami K et al. Novacor left ventricular assist system versus HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system as a long-term mechanical circulatory support device in bridging patients: A prospective study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119(3):581-7.
  5. Frazier OH, Myers TJ, Jarvik RK, Westaby S el at. Research and development of an implantabli, axial-flow left ventricular assist decvice: The Jarvik 2000 Heart. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71(3 suppl):S125-32.
  6. Goldstein DJ, Oz MC, Rose EA. Implantable left ventricular assist devices. NEJM 1998;339:1522-33.
  7. Grady KL, Meyer P, Mattea A, White-Williams C, Ormaza S et al. Improvement in quality of life outcomes 2 weeks after left ventricular assist device implantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2001;20(6):657-69.
  8. Korfer R, El-Banayosy A, Arusoglu L, Minami K, Korner MM et al. Single-centre experience with the thoratec ventricular assist device. J Thoarc Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119(3):596-600.
  9. Kyo S, Tanabe H, Asano H, Ohuchi H, Nogaki H et al. Clinical effects of ventricular assist system in end-stage cardiac failure. Advantages of left ventricular blood drainage for recovery fram cardiac dysfunction. Jpn J Thoarc Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48(7):440-6.
  10. Loisance D, Tixier D, Mazzucotelli JP et al. Mechanical circulatory support towards the permanent implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997 Apr;11 Suppl:S25-S28.
  11. Lönn U, Peterzén B, Granfeldt H et al. Hemopump treatment in patients with post-cardiotomy heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1067-71.
  12. Noon GP, Morley DL, Irwin S, Abdelsayed SV et al. Clinical experience with the MicroMed DeBakey ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71(3 suppl):S133-8.
  13. Pae WE. Ventricular assist devices and total artificial hearts: a combined registry. Ann Thorac Surg 1993 Jan;55(1):295-8.
  14. Poirier VL. The HeartMate left ventricular assist system: worldwide clinical results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997 Apr;11 Suppl:S39-S44.
  15. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, Heitjan DF, Stevenson LW, Dembitsky D et al. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Eng J Med 2001;345(20):1435-43.
  16. Schmid C, Wilhelm M, Rothenburger M, Nabavi D, Deng MC et al. Effect of high dose platetlet inhibitor treatment on thromboembolism in Novacor patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17(3):331-5.
  17. Socialstyrelsen. Hjärtsvikt. SoS rapport 1994:3.
  18. Wernicke JT, Meier D, Mizuguchi K et al. A fluid dynamic analysis using flow visualization of the Baylor/NASA implantable axial flow blood pump for design improvement. Artif Organs 1995 Feb;19(2):161-77.
  19. Westaby S, Katsumata T, Evans R et al. The Jarvik 2000 Oxford system: increase the scope of mechanical circulatory support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997 Sep;114: 467-74.
Published: Revised: 12/19/2001
Page updated