Back and neck pain

This document was published more than 2 years ago. The nature of the evidence may have changed.

This is an 800-page report on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of back and neck pain. Also covered in the report are the economic, social, and psychosocial aspects of back pain. An international working group of 13 researchers in the fields of medicine, epidemiology, psychology, and economics did a systematic review of the findings from clinical research of different options to treat back pain. Report took 4 years to complete. Altogether 25 000 studies were identified of wich 2000 were finally referenced in this report. The evidence was graded as strong (A), moderate (B), limited (C), or no evidence (D).

The scientific basis for more than 30 different treatments was systematically reviewed. For the majority of these thare are either no evidence or limited evidence in favor of treatment. For some modalities there is strong or moderate evidence against their effectiveness, eg, by traction, aerobics, stretching, and bed rest. For a minority of treatments there isstrong evidence of effectiveness, eg, for antiinflammatory and muscle relaxant drugs, manual treatment, manipulation, exercise, multidisciplinary treatment, spa treatment, and continuation of normal activities.

For diagnosing: Systematic anamnesis and physical examination are good foundations for correct diagnosis (B). Radiographic studies are of limited value.

For acute low back pain: Normal activities result in faster recovery and fewer chronic functional disorders (A), anti-inflammatory and muscle relaxant drugs offer effective pain relief (A), while bed-rest is not effective (A).

For chronic back pain: Manual treatment/manipulation, back training, and multidisciplinary treatment effectively relieve pain (A). Intensive treatment at a health resort reduces pain in the short term for elderly patients (>60 years of age) with chronic low back problems (A).

Surgery: For herniated discs, effective (A). For surgical fusion, no evidence (D).

For neck pain, the evidence is sparse. The only firm evidence is that acupuncture is not effective (A). Psychological and social factors may have a strong influence on back and neck pain.

SBU conclusions include:

  • Back and neck pain is common. Healing is promoted by staying active, returning to work, and exercising at an appropriate intensity.
  • A thorough anamnesis and physical examination is important for relieving anxiety about the consequences of pain and sufficient for identifying those who should be referred to a specialist.
  • For most patients with back pain, the interventions that can be offered in primary care are the only ones needed.
  • Back pain and its consequences are not isolated physical problems but are associated with other conditions such as social, psychological, and workplace-related factors.
  • Knowledge on how to prevent back pain has been applied and assessed to a surprisingly minor degree.
  • There is little scientific evidence on the effectiveness of most treatments.

How to cite this report:

SBU. Back and neck pain. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU); 2000. SBU report no 145/1 (in Swedish).

SBU. Back and neck pain. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU); 2000. SBU report no 145/2 (in Swedish).

Download summary

SBU Assessment presents a comprehensive, systematic assessment of available scientific evidence. The certainty of the evidence for each finding is systematically reviewed and graded. Full assessments include economic, social, and ethical impact analyses.

SBU assessments are performed by a team of leading professional practitioners and academics, patient/user representatives and SBU staff. Prior to approval and publication, assessments are reviewed by independent experts, SBU’s Scientific Advisory Committees and Board of Directors.

Published: 1/1/2000
Report no: 145/1, 145/2