For decades, all newborn infants have been examined by a paediatrician within days after being born. As part of this routine screening of all newborns the hips are being examined for potential developmental dysplasia. In Sweden there is variation in practice regarding which newborns, that in addition to the routine clinical examination, also are examined by ultrasound to detect potential developmental dysplasia of the hips (DDH).
What systematic reviews are there on ultrasound examination, in addition to routine clinical examination, of newborn infants to detect potential developmental dysplasia of the hips (DDH)?
Table 1 Systematic reviews with low/medium risk of bias.
|US = ultrasound examination; DDH = developmental dysplasia of the hip
* all infants received US; ** US examination is performed on a subset of infants (usually defined by risk of DDH, e.g. family history of DDH or female breech birth)
|Shorter et al 2011 |
2 studies compared either clinical examination or targeted US or universal US as initial screening for DDH.
3 studies compared different examination and treatment strategies out of scope of the question answered by SBU Enquiry Service
|Types of infants:
All newborn infants (up to 6 weeks of age) being screened for DDH.
Types of interventions:
Combinations (13) of different types of examination strategies for DDH:
|Incidence of late diagnosed DDH (> 8 weeks of age, diagnosed by either clinical examination, ultrasound, or x-ray), for which either medical och surgical intervention is needed.|
“There is insufficient evidence to give clear recommendations for practice. There is inconsistent evidence that universal ultrasound results in a significant increase in treatment compared to the use of targeted ultrasound or clinical examination alone. Neither of the ultrasound strategies have been demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes including late diagnosed DDH and surgery. The studies are substantially underpowered to detect significant differences in the uncommon event of late detected DDH or surgery.”
In addition, 17 primary studies were identified [2–18]. The primary studies were not assessed for risk of bias
- Shorter D, Hong T, Osborn DA. Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2011;2011:CD004595-CD004595.
- Afaq AA, Stokes S, Fareed H, Zadeh HG, Watson M. Ultrasound in the selective screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences 2011;15:394-398.
- Tong SHY, Eid MAM, Chow W, To MKT. Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in Hong Kong. Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) 2011;19:200-203.
- Tschauner C, Fürntrath F, Saba Y, Berghold A, Radl R. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: impact of sonographic newborn hip screening on the outcome of early treated decentered hip joints-a single center retrospective comparative cohort study based on Graf's method of hip ultrasonography. Journal of children's orthopaedics 2011;5:415-424.
- Clarke NMP, Reading IC, Corbin C, Taylor CC, Bochmann T. Twenty years experience of selective secondary ultrasound screening for congenital dislocation of the hip. Archives of disease in childhood 2012;97:423-429.
- von Kries R, Ihme N, Altenhofen L, Niethard FU, Krauspe R, Rückinger S. General ultrasound screening reduces the rate of first operative procedures for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a case-control study. The Journal of pediatrics 2012;160:271-275.
- Barr LV, Rehm A. Should all twins and multiple births undergo ultrasound examination for developmental dysplasia of the hip?: A retrospective study of 990 multiple births. The bone & joint journal 2013 Jan;95:132-134.
- Price KR, Dove R, Hunter JB. Current screening recommendations for developmental dysplasia of the hip may lead to an increase in open reduction. The bone & joint journal 2013 Jun;95:846-850.
- Laborie LB, Engesæter I, Lehmann TG, Eastwood DM, Engesæter LB, Rosendahl K. Screening strategies for hip dysplasia: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 2013 June;132:492‐501.
- Laborie LB, Markestad TJ, Davidsen H, Brurås KR, Aukland SM, Bjørlykke JA, et al. Selective ultrasound screening for developmental hip dysplasia: effect on management and late detected cases. A prospective survey during 1991-2006. Pediatric radiology 2014;44:410-424.
- Donnelly KJ, Chan KW, Cosgrove AP. Delayed diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in Northern Ireland: Can we do better? Bone and Joint Journal 2015;97:1572-1576.
- Mace J, Paton RW. Neonatal clinical screening of the hip in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a 15-year prospective longitudinal observational study. The bone & joint journal 2015;97:265-269.
- Tyagi R, Zgoda MR, Short R. Targeted Screening of Hip Dysplasia in Newborns: Experience at a District General Hospital in Scotland. Orthopedic reviews 2016;8:6640-6640.
- Talbot C, Adam J, Paton R. Late presentation of developmental dysplasia of the hip : a 15-year observational study. The bone & joint journal 2017;99:1250-1255.
- Choudry QA, Paton RW. Neonatal screening and selective sonographic imaging in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip. The bone & joint journal 2018;100:806-810.
- Olsen SF, Blom HC, Rosendahl K. Introducing universal ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip doubled the treatment rate. Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) 2018;107:255-261.
- Westacott DJ, Butler D, Shears E, Cooke SJ, Gaffey A. Universal versus selective ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B 2018;27:387-390.
- Gyurkovits Z, Sohár G, Baricsa A, Németh G, Orvos H, Dubs B. Early detection of developmental dysplasia of hip by ultrasound. Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy 2019:1120700019879687-1120700019879687.
SBU Enquiry Service Consists of structured literature searches to highlight studies that can address questions received by the SBU Enquiry Service from Swedish healthcare or social service providers. We assess the risk of bias in systematic reviews and when needed also quality and transferability of results in health economic studies. Relevant references are compiled by an SBU staff member, in consultation with an external expert when needed.
|Registration no:||SBU 2019/670|