Hospital at home compared with in-hospital care according to current Swedish healthcare routine for selected patients with respiratory tract infection
What evidence is needed?
More primary research is needed.
What evidence is available?
Reliable systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:
Bengtsson M, Aghamn E, Bergh C, Carlsson Y, Ekelund A, Eneljung T, Freytag L, Gyberg A, Hellström A, Holmberg Y, Peters S, Scharenberg C, Svanberg T, Terins E, Khan J och Wartenberg C. Benefits and risks of hospital at home compared to in-hospital care according to current Swedish healthcare routine [Fördelar och risker med sjukhusvård i hemmet jämfört med inneliggande vård enligt nuvarande vårdrutin i Sverige]. Göteborg: Västra Götalandsregionen, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, HTAcentrum; 2025. Regional activity based HTA 2025:143. More about the review
Reliable, but not updated, systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:
None identified
- Registration number:
- Published:
Evidence gap identifies methods or practices for which no conclusive systematic review of benefits and harms has been published. Gaps in scientific evidence appear on the SBU website to help researchers and granting agencies identify areas that are in need of research or systematic review. An additional objective is to offer healthcare and social service providers a basis for setting priorities.