Observera att det är möjligt att ladda ner hela eller delar av en publikation. Denna pdf/utskrift behöver därför inte vara komplett. Hela publikationen och den senaste versionen hittar ni på www.sbu.se/ut202511
Sammanställning av systematiska översikter från SBU:s upplysningstjänst
Vilken är effekten av interventioner rörande psykisk och fysisk hälsa hos adopterade barn och vuxna?
Frågeställare: Myndigheten för familjerätt och föräldraskapsstöd
I Sverige lever idag omkring 60 000 personer som har adopterats från andra länder [1]. Internationellt adopterade löper ökad risk för psykisk ohälsa, svårigheter i nära relationer och social utsatthet jämfört med befolkningssnittet, både som unga och vuxna [2].
Insatser specifikt riktade till adopterade kan vara både förebyggande insatser i form av föräldragrupper, rådgivning i anknytningsfrågor och grupper för barn och unga, eller riktade insatser som till exempel stöd vid psykisk ohälsa [3]. Det finns inga riktlinjer framtagna för vilka insatser eller vilken typ av stöd som bör ges till adopterade barn eller vuxna.
Upplysningstjänsten har tillsammans med frågeställaren formulerat frågan enligt följande PIO:
Population: Personer som adopterats som barn, alla åldersgrupper
Intervention: Interventioner och stöd till adopterade eller deras föräldrar om målet är utfall hos det adopterade barnet
Outcome: Psykisk och fysisk hälsa, neuropsykiatrisk diagnos, kriminalitet eller social utsatthet hos adopterade personer
Upplysningstjänsten har gjort sökningar (Bilaga 1) i databaserna MedLine, Scopus, PsycInfo, SOCIndex, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, ERIC och Sociological Abstracts.
Vi inkluderar systematiska översikter publicerade i vetenskapliga tidskrifter samt systematiska översikter från myndigheter och HTA-organisationer, som har publicerats på engelska eller ett av de skandinaviska språken.
Upplysningstjänstens litteratursökning genererade totalt 1 612 artikelsammanfattningar (abstrakt) efter dubblettkontroll. Ett flödesschema för urvalsprocessen visas i Bilaga 2. Två utredare på SBU läste alla artikelsammanfattningar och bedömde att 55 översikter kunde vara relevanta för frågorna. Dessa artiklar lästes i fulltext av utredarna och de artiklar som inte var relevanta för frågorna exkluderades. Exkluderade artiklar finns listade i Bilaga 3.
SBU:s upplysningstjänst identifierade två relevanta systematiska översikter som bedömdes ha måttlig risk för bias, och sex som bedömdes ha hög risk för bias. Bedömning av risk of bias finns i Bilaga 4. Eftersom hög risk för bias innebär en betydande risk för att resultaten är missvisande presenterar vi inga resultat eller slutsatser från de översikterna.
Sökning och urval av studier, samt bedömning av risk för bias beskrivs i metodavsnittet. Resultaten har inte analyserats utifrån svenska förhållanden.
I nedanstående tabell listas de översikter som vi bedömt vara relevanta för frågan.
| Included studies | Population, Intervention, Control | Outcome and Results |
|---|---|---|
| Dalgaard et al, [4] Parenting interventions to support parent/child attachment and psychosocial adjustment in foster and adoptive parents and children: A systematic review |
||
| 44 studies with data from 27 different samples. Meta-analysis included 24 studies analyzing 16 different samples (14 RCT, 2 non-RCT); children n=1302, parents n=1344. Setting: USA: 14 studies UK: 2 studies The Netherlands: 5 studies Italy: 2 studies Belgium: 1 study |
Population: Foster and adoptive families with children aged between 0 and 17 years. Interventions:
Duration: Mean duration 9.69 week (range: 1–12.5 weeks) (reported in 8 studies). Average number of treatment sessions 10.28 (range: 5–18). Comparison: No treatment, treatment as usual/ other interventions /treatments offered (including normal service provision), or wait-list control |
CHILD OUTCOME – overall psychosocial adjustment (10 studies): SMD: 0.37 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.65), statistically significant positive effect of moderate size in favour of intervention, some heterogeneity I2=56% – externalizing behavior (8 studies): SMD: 0.37 (95% CI, −0.09 to 0.83), large heterogeneity I2=81% – internalizing symptoms (5 studies): SMD: 0.20 (95% CI, −0.02 to 0.42) – attachment security (3 studies): SMD: 0.59 (95% CI, −0.40 to 1.57), some heterogeneity I2=62% – observed positive child behavior (4 studies): SMD: 0.39 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.64), statistically significant positive effect of moderate size in favour of intervention, little heterogeneity I2=11% PARENT OUTCOME – observed positive parent outcome (10 studies): SMD: 1.56 (95% CI, 0.81 to 2.31), statistically significant positive effect of large size in favour of intervention, large heterogeneity I2=96% – parenting stress (9 studies): SMD: 0.24 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.46), statistically significant positive effect of small size in favour of intervention – parental depression symptoms (3 studies): SMD: 0.59 (95% CI −0.08 to 1.25, inconclusive effect, little heterogeneity I2=35% FOLLOW-UP (3–6 months post-intervention) Inconclusive evidence on any outcome due to too few studies. Subgroup analyses: No evidence that the effect differs by foster/ adopted status on any outcome |
| Authors' conclusion: “Findings from this review indicate that parenting interventions based on attachment theory increase the overall psychosocial adjustment of children in foster and adoptive families as reported by their caregivers after the intervention. Attachment-based parenting interventions also increase positive parent/child interactional behaviours post intervention based on independent observation and decrease self-reported parenting stress. In summary these findings suggest that attachment-based parenting interventions have benefits for foster and adopted children and for foster and adoptive parents” |
||
| Purrington et al, [5] Family-based psychological interventions for domestically adoptive families: a systematic review |
||
| 20 studies with data from 18 samples Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) Setting: UK: 9 studies USA: 7 studies Canada: 1 study Poland: 1 study |
Population: ≥729 domestically adopted children 0–18 years, ≥829 adoptive parents 4 studies: 0–6 years9 studies: 7–11 years 5 studies: 12–18 years Interventions: Family-based psychological interventions for adoptive families. Intervention included one or two adoptive parent(s) and their adoptive child(ren). Intervention aimed directly to the parent–child dyad with a specific focus on building attachments and/or processing trauma Single model:
Comparison: Intervention controls, care as usual, retrospective controls,non-equivalent controls, studies with no control |
Synthesis of findings organised by age of child at the beginning of the intervention Effective for trauma symptomatology in child: ARC, FFF-EMDR, EMDR-FT, HC2.0, SI-T-P Effective for externalising difficulties in child; ARC, EMDR-FT, HC2.0, SI-T-P, NPP, WFT Effective for internalising difficulties in child: MBT-F, EMDR-FT, NPP Effective for measures of parental change: ARC, EMDR-FT, HC2.0 Participants reported strengthening in attachment: DDP, Kindermusik, NPP Participants reported positive change in child: DDP, LI, PMFT, NPP Participants reported positive change in parent: DDP, Kindermusik, LI, MBT-F, MST, MFT Interventions targeting younger children (0–7 years) prioritize relationship building and work with more body-based sensory work and attachment-based play. Interventions targeting younger schoolchildren (8–11 years) focus on here-and-now, attachment and regulation albeit with shifting focus towards early life history and processing traumatic experiences. Interventions for older children (12–18 years) commonly focus on problem solving, communication enhancing, trust and relationship building. In addition two interventions concerned developing a coherent life narrative for the child. |
| Authors' conclusion: “Findings provide preliminary support for integrative interventions which include aspects of sensory activities, attachment-based play, Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy and Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing with Therapeutic Input provided to adopted children and adoptive parents separately, alongside the adoptive family. However, risk of bias was high, limiting the conclusions. Future research should examine the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of integrative therapeutic approaches for adoptive families to further direct clinical practice.” |
||
| SMD = standardized mean difference | ||
Vi identifierade även sex systematiska översikter [6-11] där vi bedömde att risken för bias var hög. Översikterna undersökte en stor mängd olika typer av interventioner riktade till adopterade barn och deras adoptivföräldrar, så som anknytningsfokuserad terapi, KBT, familjeterapi och föräldrautbildningsinsatser.
I sökningen har vi identifierat följande referenser som kan vara relevanta för vidare läsning:
År 2020 publicerades en rapport från SBU:s Upplysningstjänst där även utfall för föräldrar inkluderades [14].
Upplysningstjänsten gör en systematisk sökning i minst två vetenskapliga databaser. Fullständig sökdokumentation finns i Bilaga 1.
Bedömning av vilka artiklar som är relevanta sker i två steg och utgår från frågeställningen.
Skillnader i bedömningarna löses genom diskussion.
Flödesschema för urval av artiklar finns i Bilaga 2. Exkluderade artiklar finns i Bilaga 3.
Risk för bias i relevanta systematiska översikter bedöms av två utredare, oberoende av varandra. Skillnader i bedömningarna löses genom diskussion.
Vid bedömning används granskningsmallen SnabbSTAR. SnabbSTAR har fem steg, där översikter som uppfyller de krav som ställs i steg 1–4 bedöms ha måttlig risk för bias, och om 1–5 är uppfyllda bedöms risken för bias vara låg.
En översikt som har brister i stegen 1–4 bedöms ha hög risk för bias och redovisas inte eftersom resultaten kan vara missvisande.
SBU:s bedömning av risk för bias finns redovisad i Bilaga 4. Granskningsmallen SnabbSTAR finns i Bilaga 5.
Detta svar är sammanställt av Marie Nilsson (utredare), Emma Palmqvist Wojda (utredare, produktsamordnare), Sara Fundell (projektadministratör), Maral Jolstedt (intern sakkunnig) samt Pernilla Östlund (avdelningschef) vid SBU.
| Search terms | Items found | |
|---|---|---|
| Population: | ||
| 1. | Adoption/ | 4977 |
| 2. | Child, Adopted/ | 179 |
| 3. | ((adopted or adoptive) adj3 (child* or infant* or teen* or adolescent* or famil* or parent* or mother* or father* or sibling* or person*)).ab,bt,kf,ti. | 3995 |
| 4. | (adoption or adoptee*).bt,kw,ti. | 10 587 |
| 5. | international adoption.ab. | 194 |
| 6. | internationally adopted.ab,bt,kf,ti. | 571 |
| 7. | or/1-6 | 15 909 |
| Study types: systematic reviews and meta-analysis | ||
| 8. | (Systematic Review/ or Scoping Review/ or Meta-Analysis/ or (((systematic or scoping or literature or realist or integrative or mapping or evidence) adj4 (review or synthes*)) or "meta analy*" or metaanaly*).ti,bt,ab.) not (editorial/ or letter/ or case reports/) | 789 284 |
| Combined sets: | ||
| 9. | 7 and 8 | 686 |
| Final result | ||
| 10. | 686 | |
| /= Term from the MeSH controlled vocabulary; .sh = Term from the MeSH controlled vocabulary; exp = Term from MeSH including terms found below this term in the MeSH hierarchy; .ti,ab = Title or abstract; .tw = Title or abstract; .kf = Keywords; .kw = Keywords, exact; .bt = Book title. NLM Bookshelf; .pt = Publication type;.ja = Journal abbreviation; .af = All fields; adjn = Adjacent. Proximity operator retrieving adjacent words, adj3 retrieves records with search terms within two terms from each other; * or $ = Truncation; “ “ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase | ||
| Search terms | Items found | |
|---|---|---|
| Population: | ||
| 1. | TITLE-ABS-KEY ( adopted W/3 ( child* OR infant* OR teen* OR adolescent* OR famil* OR sibling* OR person* ) ) | 8121 |
| 2. | TITLE-ABS-KEY ( adoptive W/3 ( parent OR parents OR mother* OR father* ) ) | 2781 |
| 3. | TITLE (adoption OR adoptee*) | 54 593 |
| 4. | TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "international adoption" OR "internationally adopted" ) | 1605 |
| 5. | 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 4 | 63 024 |
| Study types: systematic reviews and meta-analysis | ||
| 6. | ( TITLE-ABS-KEY ( ( ( systematic OR scoping OR realist OR mapping OR integrative OR literature ) W/2 review ) OR "meta analy*" OR metaanaly* OR ( ( systematic OR evidence OR literature ) W/2 synthes* ) ) ) AND ( EXCLUDE ( DOCTYPE , "le" ) OR EXCLUDE ( DOCTYPE , "ed" ) OR EXCLUDE ( DOCTYPE , "ch" ) OR EXCLUDE ( DOCTYPE , "cp" ) ) | 1 282 222 |
| Limits: | ||
| 7. | ( EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "ENGI" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "ENVI" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "DECI" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "ENER" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "ECON" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "AGRI" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "BIOC" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "MATH" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "MATE" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "CENG" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "EART" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "PHAR" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "PHYS" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "COMP" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA , "BUSI" ) ) | |
| Combined sets: | ||
| 8. | 5 AND 6 | 2610 |
| 9. | 8 AND 7 | 814 |
| Final result | ||
| 10. | 9 | 814 |
| TITLE-ABS-KEY = Title, abstract or keywords (including indexed keywords and author keywords); ALL = All fields; W/n = Within. Proximity operator retrieving terms within n words from each other; PRE/n = Precedes by. Proximity operator, the first term in the search must precede the second by n words; LIMIT-TO (X) = Includes only results of specified type, e.g., publication type or time range; DOCTYPE = Publication type; “re” = review “le” = letter; “ed”= editorial;“ch” = book chapter; “cp” = conference proceedings; * = Truncation; “ “ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase | ||
| TI = Title; AB = Abstract; SU = Keyword, exact or part (including all other fields for indexed and author keywords); DE = Exact keyword;TX = All text; MR = Methodology; Nn = Near. Proximity operator retrieving terms within n words from each other; * = Truncation; “ “ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase | ||
| Search terms | Items found | |
|---|---|---|
| Population: | ||
| 1. | DE "Adoption (Child)" OR DE "Adoptees" OR DE "International Adoption" OR DE "Interracial Adoption" OR DE "Adopted Children" OR DE "Adoptive Parents" | 6542 |
| 2. | TI ( ((adopted OR adoptive) N4 (child* OR infant* OR famil* OR parent* OR mother* OR father* OR person* OR teen* OR adolescent* OR sibling*)) ) OR AB ( ((adopted OR adoptive) N4 (child* OR infant* OR famil* OR parent* OR mother* OR father* OR person* OR teen* OR adolescent* OR sibling*)) ) OR KW ( ((adopted OR adoptive) N4 (child* OR infant* OR famil* OR parent* OR mother* OR father* OR person* OR teen* OR adolescent* OR sibling*)) ) | 7318 |
| 3. | TI ("internationally adopted" OR adoptee* ) OR AB ( "international adoption" OR "internationally adopted" OR adoptee* ) OR KW ( "international adoption" OR "internationally adopted" OR adoptee* ) | 2512 |
| 4. | TI (adoption) | 7348 |
| 5. | 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 4 | 14 368 |
| Study types: systematic reviews and meta-analysis | ||
| 6. | TI (((systematic or scoping or literature or realist or integrative or mapping or evidence) N4 (review or synthes*)) or "meta analy*" or metaanaly*)) OR AB (((systematic or scoping or literature or realist or integrative or mapping or evidence) N4 (review or synthes*)) or "meta analy*" or metaanaly*)) OR KW (((systematic or scoping or literature or realist or integrative or mapping or evidence) N4 (review or synthes*)) or "meta analy*" or metaanaly*)) | 221 784 |
| Combined sets: | ||
| 7. | 5 and 6 | 577 |
| Final result | ||
| 8. | 577 | |
| TI = Title; AB = Abstract; SU = Keyword, exact or part (including all other fields for indexed and author keywords); Nn = Near. Proximity operator retrieving terms within n words from each other; * = Truncation; “ “ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase | ||
| Search terms | Items found | |
|---|---|---|
| Population: | ||
| 1. | TI ( ((adopted OR adoptive) N4 (child* OR infant* OR famil* OR parent* OR mother* OR father* OR person* OR teen* OR adolescent* OR sibling*)) ) OR AB ( ((adopted OR adoptive) N4 (child* OR infant* OR famil* OR parent* OR mother* OR father* OR person* OR teen* OR adolescent* OR sibling*)) ) OR SU ( ((adopted OR adoptive) N4 (child* OR infant* OR famil* OR parent* OR mother* OR father* OR person* OR teen* OR adolescent* OR sibling*)) ) | 7631 |
| 2. | TI ("internationally adopted" OR adoptee* ) OR AB ( "international adoption" OR "internationally adopted" OR adoptee* ) OR SU ( "international adoption" OR "internationally adopted" OR adoptee* ) | 2776 |
| 3. | TI (adotion) | 7897 |
| 4. | 1 OR 2 OR 3 | |
| Study types: systematic reviews and meta-analysis | ||
| 5. | TI (((systematic or scoping or literature or realist or integrative or mapping or evidence) N4 (review or synthes*)) or "meta analy*" or metaanaly*)) OR AB (((systematic or scoping or literature or realist or integrative or mapping or evidence) N4 (review or synthes*)) or "meta analy*" or metaanaly*)) OR SU (((systematic or scoping or literature or realist or integrative or mapping or evidence) N4 (review or synthes*)) or "meta analy*" or metaanaly*)) | 40 446 |
| Combined sets: | ||
| 6. | 4 AND 5 | 516 |
| Final result | ||
| 7. | 516 | |
| TI = Title; AB = Abstract; SU = Subjects; N/n = Near. Proximity operator retrieving terms within n words from each other; * = Truncation; “ “ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase | ||
| Search terms | Items found | |
|---|---|---|
| Population: | ||
| 1. | MAINSUBJECT.EXACT.EXPLODE("Adoption") OR (MAINSUBJECT.EXACT("Adopted children") OR MAINSUBJECT.EXACT("Adoptive parents")) | 6428 |
| 2. | title(((adopted OR adoptive) N/4 (child* OR infant* OR famil* OR parent* OR mother* OR father* OR person* OR teen* OR adolescent* OR sibling*))) OR abstract(((adopted OR adoptive) N/4 (child* OR infant* OR famil* OR parent* OR mother* OR father* OR person* OR teen* OR adolescent* OR sibling*))) | 4467 |
| 3. | title("internationally adopted" OR adoptee* ) OR abstract("international adoption" OR "internationally adopted" OR adoptee* ) | 1656 |
| 4. | title(adoption) | 5474 |
| 5. | 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 4 | 10 862 |
| Study types: systematic reviews and meta-analysis | ||
| 6. | Subject (((systematic or scoping or literature or realist or integrative or mapping or evidence) N/4 (review or synthes*)) or "meta analy*" or metaanaly*) or title (((systematic or scoping or literature or realist or integrative or mapping or evidence) N/4 (review or synthes*)) or "meta analy*" or metaanaly*) or abstract (((systematic or scoping or literature or realist or integrative or mapping or evidence) N/4 (review or synthes*)) or "meta analy*" or metaanaly*) | 115 430 |
| Limits: | ||
| 7. | EXCLUDE (Dissertations & Theses AND Conference Papers & Proceedings) | |
| Combined sets: | ||
| 8. | 5 AND 6 | 739 |
| 9. | 8 AND 7 | 660 |
| Final result | ||
| 17. | 10 and 11 | 660 |
| Excluded articles | Reason for exclusion |
|---|---|
| Systematic reviews | |
| Anbari M, Nazri Bin Abdul Rahman M. The Adoptees’ Behavioral Challenges in Adaptive Families: a systematic review. Payesh (Health Monitor) Journal. 2024;23(5):737-50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.61186/payesh.23.5.737 | Wrong language |
| NICE. Interventions to support looked-after children and young people transitioning out of care to living with adoptive or birth parents or special guardians, or into connected care. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2021;10:10. | Wrong population |
| Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH, Juffer F. Earlier is better: a meta-analysis of 70 years of intervention improving cognitive development in institutionalized children. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2008;73(3):279-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2008.00498.x | Wrong population |
| Carr A, Duff H, Craddock F. A Systematic Review of Reviews of the Outcome of Severe Neglect in Underresourced Childcare Institutions. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020;21(3):484-97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018777788 | Not a systematic review |
| Colom J, Segura-Garcia L, Bastons-Compta A, Astals M, Andreu-Fernandez V, Barcons N, et al. Prevalence of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) among Children Adopted from Eastern European Countries: Russia and Ukraine. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):1388. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041388 | Not a systematic review |
| David R, Dembrey N, Majumder P. Outcomes from attachment-based group interventions for foster carers and adoptive parents: A systematic review. Adopt Foster. 2024;48(2):243-77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759241264065 | Relevant results not analysed separately |
| Drozd F, Bergsund HB, Hammerstrøm KT, Hansen MB, Jacobsen H. A Systematic Review of Courses, Training, and Interventions for Adoptive Parents. J Child Fam Stud. 2017;27(2):339-54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0901-7 | Wrong outcome |
| Fensbo C. Mental and behavioural outcome of inter-ethnic adoptees: a review of the literature. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;13(2):55-63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-004-0358-2 | Not a systematic review |
| Fisher PA. Review: Adoption, fostering, and the needs of looked-after and adopted children. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2015;20(1):5-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12084 | Not a systematic review |
| Freeark K, Rosenberg EB, Bornstein J, Jozefowicz-Simbeni D, Linkevich M, Lohnes K. Gender differences and dynamics shaping the adoption life cycle: review of the literature and recommendations. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2005;75(1):86-101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.75.1.86 | Not a systematic review |
| Hodge AS, Hook JN, Zhang H, McLaughlin AT, Mostert J, Hancock BR, et al. The effectiveness of faith-based organizations designed to support adoptive and foster care families: A systematic review of the literature. Spiritual Clin Pract. 2025;12(1):57-71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/scp0000290 | Wrong outcome |
| Kerr L, Cossar J. Attachment Interventions with Foster and Adoptive Parents: A Systematic Review. Child Abuse Rev. 2014;23(6):426-39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2313 | Relevant results not analysed separately |
| Koren G, Ornoy A. Institutionalized Children and the Risk of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD); A Primer for Clinicians, Adoption Staff and Parents. Glob Pediatr Health. 2021;8:2333794X21989556. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X21989556 | Not a systematic review |
| Liao M. Factors affecting post-permanency adjustment for children in adoption or guardianship placements: An ecological systems analysis. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016;66:131-43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.05.009 | Not a systematic review |
| Love L, Minnis H, O'Connor S. Factors Associated with Indiscriminate Friendliness in High-Risk Children. Infant Ment Health J. 2015;36(4):427-45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21520 | Relevant results not analysed separately |
| Nickman SL, Rosenfeld AA, Fine P, Macintyre JC, Pilowsky DJ, Howe RA, et al. Children in adoptive families: overview and update. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44(10):987-95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000174463.60987.69 | Not a systematic review |
| Penner J. Post-Adoption Service Provision: A Scoping Review. Adopt Q. 2023;27(4):319-48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2023.2176957 | Not a systematic review |
| Perry CL, Henry MJ. Family and Professional Considerations for Adoptive Parents of Children with Special Needs. Marriage Fam Rev. 2009;45(5):538-65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920903050938 | Wrong population |
| Peters BR, Atkins MS, McKay MM. Adopted children's behavior problems: a review of five explanatory models. Clin Psychol Rev. 1999;19(3):297-328. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00028-2 | Not a systematic review |
| Roach A, Sherburne E, Snethen J. Intercountry adoption of children with complex health conditions and disabilities: A systematic review. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2023;28(1):e12398. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jspn.12398 | Wrong outcome |
| Sánchez-Sandoval Y, Melero S, López-Jiménez AM. Mediating Effects of Social Support in the Association Between Problems in Childhood and Adolescence and Well-Being in Adult Domestic Adoptees. J Happiness Stud. 2019;21(4):1183-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00124-8 | Not a systematic review |
| Van Ijzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Juffer F. Plasticity of growth in height, weight, and head circumference: meta-analytic evidence of massive catch-up after international adoption. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007;28(4):334-43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e31811320aa | Wrong outcome |
| Welsh J, Viana A, Petrill S, Mathias M. Interventions for Internationally Adopted Children and Families: A Review of the Literature. Child Adolesc Social Work J. 2007;24(3):285-311. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-007-0085-x | Not a systematic review |
| D1 = Step 1; D2= Step 2; D3 = Step 3; D4 = Step 4; D5 = Step 5 |
||||||
| Risk of bias | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | Overall |
| Cornell 2008 | ||||||
| Dalgaard 2022 | ||||||
| Harris-Waller 2018 | ||||||
| Ni Chobhthaigh 2019 | ||||||
| Purrington 2024 | ||||||
| Rose 2017 | ||||||
| Schoemaker 2020 | ||||||
| Silberfarb 2023 | ||||||