Study categories
Areas of lifespan
Age
Population
Person with disabilities Mental disability Neuropsychiatric disability Intellectual disability Sensory disability Physical disability Dyslexia dyscalculia or language impairment Multi functional impairment Type of disability not specified Next of kin or other related persons Professionals
Areas of intervention
Work employment and leisure oriented interventions
2
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
6
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
6
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
4
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Autonomy related interventions
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
4
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Behavioural interventions
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Housing related interventions
2
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Interventions that promote participation and social life
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Physical interventions
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Interventions that promote parental ability
2
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
5
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
5
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Cognitive oriented interventions
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
Communication oriented interventions
3
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Motivation oriented interventions
Educational oriented interventions
2
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
4
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Personal Assistance
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
4
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
Psykosocial interventions
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
6
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Sensory interventions
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Support from relatives and others
4
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Transport related interventions
Health related interventions
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Interventions that affect the health and well being of relatives
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Interventions that affect the supportive capacity of relatives
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with low risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
4
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
Methods for assessment and decision making
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
5
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
1
Systematic reviews with moderate risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
2
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
3
Systematic reviews with high risk of bias
The number in the symbols represent the number of systematic reviews. The same systematic reviews may appear in more than one place in the graph. Hover over a symbol to see details with links to the systematic reviews. Use the drop-down menus above the graph to filter which systematic reviews are to be displayed. Age groups refer to persons with disabilities, not relatives of persons with disabilities or professionals.

The table is based on the report Functioning and disability