This publication was published more than 5 years ago. The state of knowledge may have changed.

Presymptomatic diagnosis of hereditary breast cancer

Reading time approx. 3 minutes Published: Updated: Publication type:

SBU Assessment

Presents a comprehensive, systematic assessment of available scientific evidence for effects on health, social welfare or disability. Full assessments include economic, social and ethical impact analyses. Assessment teams include professional practitioners and academics. Before publication the report is reviewed by external experts, and scientific conclusions approved by the SBU Board of Directors.

Findings by SBU Alert

This is a translation of version 1, published on February 2, 2000. The latest version of this report is not available in English.

The discovery that mutations in two specific genes increase the risk for breast cancer and ovarian cancer has opened new opportunities to prevent hereditary cancer. Special programs to identify, investigate, follow up, and treat individuals with hereditary breast cancer are being developed in Sweden.

There is good* evidence that certain genes are associated with the risk for cancer. There is moderate* evidence regarding the effects of preventive interventions in women at high risk for cancer. However, no studies address the effects of morbidity, mortality, and cost-effectiveness of entire programs.

There is little opportunity to assess programs for genetic screening in randomized clinical trials. However, it is essential to analyze the overall effects of mortality and the economic impact of various strategies and programs using retrospective data and model analyses.

*This assessment by SBU Alert uses a 4-point scale to grade the quality and evidence of the scientific documentation. The grades indicate: (1) good, (2) moderate, (3) poor, or (4) no scientific evidence on the subject.

This summary is based on a report prepared at SBU in collaboration with Assoc Prof Ulf Kristoffersson, MD PhD, Lund University Hospital. It has been reviewed by Prof Håkan Olsson, MD PhD, Lund University Hospital.

Alert is a joint effort by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU), the Medical Products Agency, the National Board of Health and Welfare, and the Federation of Swedish County Councils.

References

  1. Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, Botkin J, Kahn MJ, Lynch P, McTiernan A, Offit K, Perlman J, Petersen G, Thomson E, Varricco C, for the Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. JAMA 1997;277:997-1003.
  2. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. Am J Med Genet 1991;48:232-242.
  3. Dörum A, Kristensen VM, Tropé CG, Möller P. Early detection of familial ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A:1645-51.
  4. Grann VR, Panageas KS, Whang W, Antman KH, Neugut AI. Decision analysis of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in BRCA1-positive or BRCA2-positive patients. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:979-985.
  5. Grann VR, Whang W, Jacobson JS, Heitjan DF, Antman KH, Neugut AI. Benefits and costs of screening Ashkenazi Jewish women for BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:494-500.
  6. Hartman LC, Schad DJ, Woobs JE, Crotty TP, Myers JL, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340;77-84.
  7. Lalloo FI. An evaluation of clinical and laboratory services for women at high risk of breast cancer. Thesis. Medical faculty, University of Manchester, UK. 1997.
  8. Schrag D, Kuntz KM, Garber JE, Weeks JC. Decision analysis-effects of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy on life expectance among women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. New Engl J Med 1997;336:1465-71.
  9. Socialdepartementet. Synpunkter från Statens medicin-etiska råd. Uppsökande genetisk verksamhet. Dnr12/98. 1999.
  10. Socialstyrelsen/medicinsk faktadatabas MARS. Utredning, uppföljning och omhändertagande av personer med misstänkt ärftligt ökad risk för tumörsjukdom. 1999 Under remissbehandling.
  11. Socialstyrelsen Allmänna råd. Genetik inom hälso-och sjukvården. 1999. Under remissbehandling.
  12. Vasen HF, Haites NE, Evans DG, Steel CM, Möller P, et al. The European Family Cancer Clinics. Current policies for surveillance and management in women at risk of breast-and ovarian cancer: a survey among 16 European family cancer clinics. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:1922-26.
Published: Revised: 4/10/2000
Page updated